On Tue, 24 May 2011, Fred James wrote: > Are there any error message ... I assume not since you didn't mention > any, but I thought I'd ask anyway?
Fred, Nope. > OK then, this only a scanner with no other capabilities (copy, print, > etc), so one cannot test other function like the copy function output. But > what you have noticed is that the quality of the scan output has > deteriorated. Yep. > Has anything changed between the time of acceptable and unacceptable > output? The usual stuff ... OS, driver, interface, cable, etc? On the > subject of interface and cable ... have you unseated, cleaned, and > reseated these connections? If not, can you, and if yes, then was there > any change in the operation or output? Not that I can recall. I use the scanner infrequently but there's been no system upgrades in a while. > If all of the above is good, except the output continues unimproved ... > one might not be faulted for suspecting the lamp. Or maybe dirt/dust > inside the scanner (low probability, I think)? Hope that helps Regards I'm calling Portland Printer Repair this morning. They will know if 1) they fix scanners and b) if there are parts/repair kits for this guy. Thanks, Rich _______________________________________________ PLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
