Michael, Don't pull any speakers. I don't really think anyone is advocating any changes from the current system where we occasionally have speakers on non-Linux, non-Unix Open Source related topics. Indeed, this may become even more frequent in the future as Linux and the BSDs and other Unix OSs become more ubiquitous and are simply taken for granted.
David Mandel On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Michael Dexter <[email protected]> wrote: > On 9/8/11 9:53 PM, Russell Johnson wrote: >>> This is PLUG (Portland Linux Users Group), not POSUG (Portland Open >>> Source Users Group). >> Bill, Strictly speaking, it's "Portland Linux/Unix Group". >> re:http://www.pdxlinux.org/ > > I saw this just after posting a PLUG AT meeting announcement about web > serving... which could theoretically get into non-FLOSS technologies! > > Shall I pull it? I just learned of Ted's unavailability and consider it > too late for another speaker. > > Should I pull the proposed topic for being too off-topic for PLUG? > > I trust it to be implied that I am discussing serving in a POSIX > Linux/BSD environment but it's borderline none the less. > > And what of networking topics? Where would the community prefer David > and I draw the line? > > Some have pointed out that the DevOps meeting might be more appropriate > for these. I really should attend one... > > Are people okay with "PLUG meetings feature the interesting speakers > that David and Michael can find"? > > Does anyone want to join in the speaker hunt to help keep things on-topic? > > Michael > _______________________________________________ > PLUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug > _______________________________________________ PLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
