On 03/13/2014 10:35 PM, Galen Seitz wrote: > On 03/13/14 21:51, Dick Steffens wrote: >> On 03/13/2014 05:50 PM, Galen Seitz wrote: >>> On 03/13/14 17:31, Dick Steffens wrote: >>> What's the advantage of OpenWrt or Gargoyle over DD-WRT? > Personal Telco (aka Russell) uses OpenWrt. He does his own builds, and > is on the developer list(s). I.e. we have an expert in our midst. > > Much less of an endorsement is that I am relatively familiar with LuCI, > the web front end that comes standard with OpenWrt. I installed an N600 > running OpenWrt at our office last summer. I also have OpenWrt running > on the WRT54GL in three locations, including here at home. > > The bottom line is that if you use OpenWrt, you'll have someone local to > ask questions should the need arise.
On 03/14/2014 12:06 AM, King Beowulf wrote: > With DD-Wrt there is some F/OSS licensing issues and historically they > have been accused of GPL violations in the past. <snip> > > IIRC, OpenWRT is fully F/OSS - no strings attached. <snip> > > I mentioned Gargoyle simply to point out a nice alternative to Luci web > front end. <snip> Those are good enough reasons. I'll bring the gadget to the clinic Sunday and we'll give it a shot. Thanks. -- Regards, Dick Steffens _______________________________________________ PLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
