On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 05:46:44PM -0800, Tim Wescott wrote:
> Does anyone with recent experience know if this method of obfuscating
> email addresses on web pages still works to frustrate the spam-bots?
> 
> <a href='mail&#116;o&#58;J&#37;6Fh&#110;&#46;%
> 4&#52;oe&#64;exam&#112;&#108;e%&#50;Ec%
> 6Fm'>&#74;o&#104;n&#46;Doe&#64;&#101;xa&#109;ple&#46;com</a>
> 
> (It encodes "[email protected]", if my sources are correct)
> 
> It's been around forever, it would seem that the slimeballs would have
> upgraded by now.

I'm lazy.  I use an image.  If I was less lazy, I would rotate
the image 20 degrees, and decorate it with roses and garlands. 
This sounds like a good job for our unemployed slacker artist
friends.  I don't trust any reversable, deterministic algorithm,
and my slacker friends are annoyingly non-deterministic.

Keith

-- 
Keith Lofstrom          [email protected]
_______________________________________________
PLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

Reply via email to