I agree that this is an issue with the printer's IP address. I have a few
of these. I'm too lazy to write down all the steps to deal with this, but I
made a video of how to view and set the IP.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJvNbBbrsgU

You can find the IP address your internal network uses by running the
"ifconfig" command on the command line:

$ ifconfig
eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 40:40:72:FD:A5:B0
          inet addr:192.168.1.59  Bcast:192.168.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
          inet6 addr: fe80::4240:72ff:fefd:a5b0/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:163214907 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:223887222 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
          RX bytes:12206629277 (11.3 GiB)  TX bytes:193416766812 (180.1 GiB)
          Interrupt:24

note the line stating "inet addr:" - this is the IP you should emulate.
don't use the same one for your printer, use one that won't ever be used
elsewhere on your network. 254 is a good bet because it's the highest, and
most networks don't reach the highest number. but it's not guaranteed.

You seem an intrepid type, so hopefully this gives you the right direction
to pursue.

You should be able to ping the IP address once it's set properly:

$ ping 192.168.1.254
PING 192.168.1.254 (192.168.1.254) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=62.8 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=61.5 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=62.3 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=4 ttl=49 time=60.8 ms
^C
--- 192.168.1.254 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3004ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 60.873/61.901/62.810/0.749 ms

If you can't, you're still having a network problem, don't bother messing
with your printer configs until this is resolved and you get ping responses.

-wes

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Charles <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 11/05/2015 07:06 PM, John Bartley K7AAY [email protected] wrote:
> <snip>
> > Charles, a Penguinista could also remotely access your system and, with
> > you at the system to unplug/replug if needed, help you solve your issue
> > without schlepping out 26.
>
> I really like these
> remote screen connections & "virtual network connections", John.
>
> I have used them before;
> & with a good teckie on the other end,
> frequently problems can quickly be remedied.
>
> But, under such a set-up, i think i would need
> one of the fellas here to agree to try to
> work with me in solving my printer-problem with it.
>
> And this technology is great for curing probs in a single-computer;
> but when networking & printers are involved,
> it frequently seems that live-people need to be in the room.
>
> > Here's a list of remote access apps
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_remote_desktop_software and
> > there are free remote client and server apps for Linux.
>
> Very nice.
> I would be happy to install one of these
> if any-one here was willing to
> dive more deeply in-to the difficulties of my system.
>
> Cz ...
>
>   _______________________________________________
> > PLUG mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
> >
> _______________________________________________
> PLUG mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
>
_______________________________________________
PLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

Reply via email to