I can think of a few reasons: * There is no value in spending any calories on rejected candidates * Potential liability * Potential for extra arguments, hassle and follow up * It is proprietary knowledge, many applications are generated and almost all are screened by a LLM - so giving feedback would let the generating LLM/human to tune for success. * Work load - they maybe rejecting many candidates for a few positions. Not necessarily because of a particular reason * There is whole industry of asking job candidates to generate resumes for training or for sale - essentially for free, just by advertising a job opportunity.
Applying/searching for a job is no fun, especially on saturated labor market, that is for sure. -T On Fri, Jul 25, 2025, 17:59 James Tobin <jamesbto...@gmail.com> wrote: > Why do you think that is? > > On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 at 21:55, <ken...@tuta.com> wrote: > > > > Yes, but I also know that employers in the U.S. generally don't want to > admit why an applicant was refused or passed on. > > Thanks | おおきに / ありがとう | Kiitos | Merci | Gracias | Obrigada | Grazie | > 谢谢 | Danke | Wado | спасибо, > > 賢進ジェンナ「Kenshin, Jenna」 > > > > "You should be as alive as you can until you're totally dead!" - Dylan > Moran > > > > > > > > 2025年7月25日 11:57 差出人: jamesbto...@gmail.com: > > > > > Hi, if you were represented by a recruiter (headhunter, recruitment > > > consultant, agent, or whatever they prefer to call themselves) for a > > > potential job with an employer, would you expect them to do everything > > > possible to get feedback on your resume, skills, experience, overall > > > application, and suitability directly from the employer after you'd > > > been presented? > > > > > >
