> > How many patches do you know exist for qmail, which > are publicly > available? Most people probably decide to keep > their changes to
there are so many of them dude go search, google.com is your friend > themselves; the license doesn't encourage > redistribution, in fact it re read the licence or have you read it? > > closed source software > if they want to > add restrictions that make a program non-Free. dude EVEN open source softwares has restrictions... that doesnt make them non free right? > it will encumber you in the exercise of the freedoms > to study, share, > and change it, I think it's time to be improving no it does not, dude re think what you have said it does not stop your freedom to study share or change it if it does 1. those who made changes to it should be sued 2. those people who made changes to it should have not released patches 3. didn't you know several better new MTA's "learned" alot from qmail? > > The quality of the software is not what's at issue > here, licensing is. The issue here is FACTS, and what is TRUE it was never been the license -Dek [EMAIL PROTECTED] __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone. http://phone.yahoo.com _ Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
