hi. hmm, i was not able to check out the defaced pages - perhaps my impulsive statement in protecting my employer. just like what orly did - he just like to set the records straight.
and orly is right. (am i wrong?) :P peace dude! percy ps: thad, i don't think that the guys were paid by the indonesian warlord to act as a catalyst in waging war between ISPs and Telcos. i think asian pride did because they want to : pure and simple. perhaps, they think they're security savvy kapag nakapag-break in sila sa isang secured system. but then again, if they really want to conduct security audits, they shouldn't have worn the fake ids! how could they tell us that they were good in security if they haven't something secured to show us? they're good in intrusion, alright, but who knows if they're security savvy? ako ulit :) On Tue, 20 Nov 2001 23:36:15 +0800 (PHT) Orlando Andico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nope. The statement "90%.." was lifted straight from the template page > which asian pride placed on all the defaced web sites.. INCLUDING abs-cbn. > If you would just read the linked defaced pages, it would seem quite > obvious that Inquirer was quoting the template. > > And that template does NOT single out my employer by name, it's more of a > general rant. It's true in any case, up to 90% of older servers out there > are compromisable through commonly known exploits. > > This is VERY different from the tone of the article, which, deviating from > the general template asian pride insisted on distributing, specifically > portrayed my employer (and myself) as a bunch of ill-informed, arrogant > fools. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
