On Fri, 14 Dec 2001 at 17:05, Juan Miguel Cacho wrote: > Filesystem corruption happened in 2.4.15, which was promtly fixed with > 2.4.16-pre1, then a couple of days later 2.4.16 came out, which is what > I'm using now.
Goodness. The nasty 2.4.15. That hit me, too. I was working on a box pre-deployment that was running ext3. So I jumped on 2.4.15. Boom. I had to reinstall. I couldn't mount anything and decided working through it and trying to recover a relatively fresh install wouldn't be worth it. It takes less than an hour to install Debian/Unstable over DSL. Hehehe. 2.4.16 has been very good, though, both for XFS and for my ext3 boxes. And RAM usage seems to be much saner than 2.4.9, thanks to Andrea's VM. It looks like Marcelo's taking his time with releases (he's up to 2.4.17-rc1 ba?). This is good, as it's the stable kernel. I just thought I'd point it out. "We're in good hands .." --> Jijo -- Federico Sevilla III :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator :: The Leather Collection, Inc. GnuPG Key: <http://jijo.leathercollection.ph/jijo.gpg> _ Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
