On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Ronald Warner wrote:

> Just need some clarifications, on the following scenarios, the same 
> router is used but different subnets are involved, the load is the 
> same, and there are 2500 users, no vlan involved.  
> 
> 1.  using ten of the subnets in 10.1.0.0/255.255.255.0
> 2.  using an unsubnetted 10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0 and using the first 
> 2500 ip addresses
> 
> If there is a server with ip address 192.168.9.1,  which pc would it 
> reach faster in the above scenario?
> 
> For me, i would say that scenario 1 would be faster than scenario 2 
> since scenario 1 has a smaller broadcast domain -- only 254 pcs 
> vs. the 2500 pcs in the second scenario.
> 
> Is my assumption correct?
> 

in general, scenario 1 will be better for most cases.  the worst case
scenario for 1 where it becomes about equal to scenario 2 is when all the
connecting hubs/switches are all bridged together (at the data-link
layer). all packets will still flood the entire lan.  logical subnetting
is at its best when there is also physical segmentation to separate each
broadcast domains.  you can place a linux pc router with multiple lan
cards to do this. 

pong

_
Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to