dude, di ba seek times are disk-dependent, not controller dependent? unless you mean said controllers do buffering.
--v Gideon N. Guillen wrote: >Orlando Andico wrote: > >>the way the high-performance IDE RAID people do it is, one DEDICATED IDE >> CONTROLLER PER HARD DRIVE. If you can do this, then IDE offers much the >> same multiprocessing performance and I/O's per second as SCSI. >> > >But isn't it that IDE raid would still be able to help in the performance in >RAID 0 configuration because it would reduce seektimes? > _ Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
