On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 05:35:14PM +0800, Federico Sevilla III wrote: > On Thu, 16 May 2002 at 19:00, Gino LV.Ledesma wrote: > > Best performance so far: > > Linux + 2.4.18 + ReiserFS + aufs + heap lru > > > > As the Squid developers said, tuning cache replacement is a fruitless > > activity as compared to tuning the file system and the access methods > > (ufs, aufs, diskd). > > Hey, cool. I just updated my Squid settings (I've already been using > ReiserFS so no need to change that).
I've tested the difference between GDSF and LFUDA and the results are definitely inconclusive. As the Squid developers say, the cache replacement policy is a fruitless attempt in Squid cache optimization. > > Tip: mount noatail the ReiserFS disks > > noatail? Or maybe you mean noatime and notail? I find this combination to > be the best for speed. :) Oh sorry. Didn't catch that typo. I meant noatime and notail. :) gino ledesma _ Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
