On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Raul Ocampo wrote: .. > Yes, at 128MB performance seems to be much better. I'm just wondering if > 192MB will give me better performance.
Yes 192MB will help. 128MB is too small. I tried it 2 weeks ago. Dismal performance. 256MB is the "sweet spot" in my experience. But I put 512MB in my workstation and have had no reason to complain (I've been at 512MB for almost a year now). --- Orlando Andico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mosaic Communications, Inc. _ Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
