Quoting Ian C. Sison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > I think you're discussing two separate things - obsolesence and > usability/deployability
Specifically, he was comparing the performance of two classes of hard drives manufactured more than a decade apart. Comparing 2002 ATA drives with 1992 SCSI drives, and then claiming based on such a comparison that SCSI is relatively performance-limited compared to ATA, just makes no sense at all. I've gone over this several times. Is the point unclear? _ Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
