Quoting eric pareja ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > But then the point now becomes planning for that possibility. Having > an alternative static website to be made available using a different > web server while Apache+PHP is still vulnerable should be in the > picture somehow.
The premise that PHP necessitates Apache is simply false, anyway. To quote from my lecture notes about PHP4 (http://www.linuxmafia.com/~rick/lecture-notes/php4): It can also work as a module under fhttpd, AOLServer, Netscape Commerce Server/iPlanet and other NSAPI-compliant httpds, Microsoft Internet Information Server / MS-Personal Web Server and other ISAPI-compliant httpds (OmniHTTPd, O'Reilly Website Pro), , phttpd, Pi3Web, Caudium, Roxen, thttpd, and Zeus -- or called via CGI by any other httpd (OmniHTTPd, Xitami, others), at the cost of fork-and-exec'ing a new process. -- Cheers, Disclaimer -- These opiini^H^H damn! ^H^H ^Q ^[ .... :w : :wq :wq! Rick Moen ^d ^X ^? exit X Q ^C ^? :quitbye CtrlAltDel ~~q :~q logout save/quit rick@linu :!QUIT ^[zz ^[ZZZZZZ ^vi man vi ^@ ^L ^[c ^# ^E ^X ^I ^T ? help xmafia.com helpquit ^D ^d !! man help ^C ^c :e! help exit ?Quit ?q CtrlShftDel _ Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fully Searchable Archives With Friendly Web Interface at http://marc.free.net.ph To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
