On 14 Nov 2002, Gerald Timothy Quimpo wrote:

> hello all,
>
> I'm trying to verify the signature of rsync-2.5.5.tar.gz.
> when i do:
>
>    gpg --verify rsync-2.5.5.tar.gz.sig
>
> gpg tells me that i have no corresponding public key.
>
> [tiger ] gpg --verify rsync-2.5.5.tar.gz.sig
> gpg: Signature made Mon 01 Apr 2002 08:53:08 PM EST using DSA key ID
> A0B3E88B
> gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
>
>
> that's fine, i know i don't have it since i just zapped my
> keyring (including private keys) and am starting over fresh.
>
> on the other hand, i can't seem to get the public key from
> any keyservers either.  has anyone done this? is the rsync
> public key on some keyserver somewhere?  i'm using mandrake 9,
> so the default keyserver is mandrake's keyserver.  all the
> main keyservers are connected, right?  are there subnetworks
> of keyservers i should try?  there's a hierarchy of trust
> for keyservers too, and i'm trying to keep my list of trusted
> keyservers small.

Im not sure if the owner uploads the public key to the keyservers.
yes, keyservers are updating each other and thats what gpg.net says :)
hehehe.
im searching public keys at pgpkeys.mit.edu && keyserver.net, if you have
nice one maybe you can share with us.

>
> and while i'm on the subject.  i'd be glad if some of the
> well known members of the list (ian? rickmoen? maybe the
> officers, and some well known non-officers) would be willing
> to share their public keyrings with me.  i'm not, of course,
> going to automatically trust keyring attachments sent via
> email or posted on the web.  but after some other offline
> communication (voice phone, snail mail, meeting, etc) i
> will incrementally bump up trust of the individual keys
> so that eventually i'll have a good working set.

agree with this. hope they can share their public keyrings with us, hehe.

>
> does anyone have any comments on this procedure?  is it a
> prudent one (assuming, of course, that the offline
> verification of keys and signatures is valid)?
>
> hmmm, this could be a useful survey too.  how much do the
> geeks on PLUG actually use gpg and gpg signatures for
> verifying packages.

>
> hehe, so i zapped my old keyring because it had been so long
> since i used it that i'd forgotten the passphrase :).  for
> something like this, i guess i need to write the passphrase
> down and put it in a safe deposit box or something :).
>
> tiger
>
> --
> Gerald Timothy Quimpo  tiger*quimpo*org gquimpo*sni-inc.com tiger*sni*ph
>
>                    Veritas liberabit vos.
>     ... region del sol querida, Perla del Mar de Oriente,
>                   nuestro perdido Eden! ...
>
> _
> Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
> To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Fully Searchable Archives With Friendly Web Interface at http://marc.free.net.ph
>
> To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to 
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fully Searchable Archives With Friendly Web Interface at http://marc.free.net.ph

To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to