Horatio B. Bogbindero wrote:
>it gets pretty messy if i would have to explain all the combinations online. > that's true. �ޥ� "Anuerin G. Diaz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >Nice stuff and although I don't have two (three if we are going to >include the testing machine) machines at home to test with this stuff, > correct. i acted like a fool when i've tested this setup using only 2 PCs. coz they both operated as master node when i yanked the cable. i did have a hard time distinguishing on whether which one is telling the truth =) >im wondering whether the statement "they should have identical >_services_" means that two machines should have the exact number and >type of services, or that each service to be 'backed-up' has to be the >same version. > they should at least have the same type of services, otherwise a service interruption will occur. it doesn't matter if they dont have the same version as long as the service is there and the data is syncronized (ie, web pages for the web server, samba passwords for samba, data & tables for mysql / postgres, etc, etc.) dito n yata papasok yun "rsync" di ba (chris) ? goodluck!!! _ Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fully Searchable Archives With Friendly Web Interface at http://marc.free.net.ph To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
