On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Ian C. Sison wrote: > > > the on disk format of reiser 3.6 is different in the sense that it allows > > NFS to be stably run over reiser filesystem. THere where numerous issues > > with reiser 3.5 and NFS in the past, which was addressed by 3.6 on disk > > format. > > Will this mean that ReiserFS 3.5 users would need an mkfs for them to > migrate on the stabler 3.6 line, once they've upgraded the kernel and > the appropriate reiserfsprogs? Or is there a painless alternative?
The "appropriate reiserfsprogs" comes with a mkreiserfs which does the job of creating a 3.6 disk format reiser fs. _ Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fully Searchable Archives With Friendly Web Interface at http://marc.free.net.ph To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
