my idea about it: http://www.geocities.com/winelfredpasamba/Computer_Man_God.anybody.html
fooler said: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Philippine Linux Users Group Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 11:25 PM > Subject: Re: [plug] [OT] Chess computers to overtake humans in 2004 > > >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 11:47:35AM +0800, fooler wrote: >> > machines right now are only purely electrical components while humans > have >> > both electrical and chemical components... machines dont have >> *instinct* >> > because they lack of chemical components... machines dont know how to > fell >> > in love because they lack of chemical components... machines dont know > how >> > to masturbate because they lack of chemical components... when time > comes >> > when human knows how to integrate both electrical and chemical > components in >> > a machine... then it is no longer called a machine but a clone to >> humans > or >> > man-made humans.... >> >> I don't think that being chemical in nature is the basis. All chemical >> reactions are the result of electromagnetic processes when you get down >> to it. The rearrangement of electrons in bonds is what causes chemical >> reactions. The true nature of what makes us human is much more >> complicated. > > yes chemicals goes down to electromagnectic processes but the intelligence > of a machine right now is only purely electrical components... its > intelligence is only based on 1 and 0 (and extended to fuzzy logic)... its > intelligence based on the input that you have given and its intelligence > cannot be expand or improve to a new level because of the limited of set > of > rules that the machine learned... unlike us as humans, we have senses.. > these senses are based on chemical components... our senses gave us to > improve our intelligence.... for example... at birth, our intelligence is > only limited to the environment of our mother womb and the inputs that our > mother given to us... how do we improve our intelligence? the answer is > chemical components... one good example is that... when we are a small > kid, > we intentionally touch a fire due to curiosity... we feel burnt (due to > chemical reactions) and we understand that touching a fire is bad.... that > is where we put more inputs on our intelligence due to chemical > components.... and that is where humans intelligence is too complex due to > chemical components... furthermore, humans cant think intelligently if he > or > she is hungry due to chemical components... so therefore humans realized > that he or she must eat in order to be intelligent (which is another input > to improve its intelligence) unlike with machines which is only purely > electrical components... it doesnt need to eat to act intelligently.... > but > the machine intelligence is only limited to what is given to it.... > > fooler. -- "There is no security in life, just opportunities." Douglas McArthur -- Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph . To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug . Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
