On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 11:41:49AM +0800, Gideon N. Guillen wrote: > I guess the difference is that WiX, unlike other windows installers is > that this one is from Micro$oft, and more "developers" will dig it > because it has the "M$ Seal of Approval". Especially those "developers" > who only know M$ development tools. They'll dig on to it not because > it's open-source, but because of M$.
and it produces .MSI files. these are not executable files, and from my reading of the MS literature, they contain dependencies and such. on the other hand, InstallShield and InstallAnywhere (which I've used - it's a Java app) produce .exe's. -- Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph . To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug . Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
