Quoting vince cagud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> actually, i believe NPTL was introduced in RH9.0. the one thing that 
> frustrates me in the RH kernels is its deviation against standard linux 
> kernel. they still prefer the VM with OOM, which runs amok in certain 
> configurations (saw it killing oracle, sheesh). gave us lots of problems 
> when we deployed it in high-load environments. most of our RH9 
> installations were brought down to RH8. i'm actually looking quite 
> warily at RHEL3 as well.
> 
> -- Vince
> 

Same here, though I moved up to FC1 because it had better Java support. So far,
RH7.3 remains a favorite for stability. I'm more cautious about FC2, which is
quite ambitious in introducing 2.6 among others. I've had enough problems with
NPTL and execshield already. I might take a backseat until the 2.6 kernel hits
2.6.12 or something. The early 2.4 kernels were more trouble than they were
worth.

-- 
Gino LV. Ledesma
  // Random Programmer's Quip: It works on my machine.
--
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph
Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph
.
To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug
.
Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to
http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie

Reply via email to