Based on my reading, you should stick to one method. (Calling the experts...) I prefer svnserve+ssh, unless there are firewalled users who can only access via HTTP.
The differences: http://svnbook.red-bean.com/svnbook/ch06.html On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:05:49 +0800, marc racal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting Miguel A Paraz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Yes, it's free. Just give me some time to set it up. Which do you > > prefer, svnserve or Apache-based? > > i never knew it can be setup apacehe-based. anyway, if you can have both, why not? > or am i asking too much? anyway, i'm new to subversion (or cvs even). at least i > have anothere place to test it aside from work. -- Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph . To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug . Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
