It could have been ok if the emails we receive in the lists are always informative, but sadly, that is not the case and the PLUG experience degrades further when we receive more useless email like these. Nakakahiya.
Jerome On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 11:57 +0800, Ron Michael Khu wrote: > err.. oops.. tiger already moved this topic... > please follow ur own "suggestions" > > oOoO. Wow! u modified the subject(new thread?)... so that doesnt count, eh? > and u just 'elaborated' on tiger's message... nice... > > arf! arf! > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > this is really getting offtopic for this list. either continue it in > plug-misc or discuss basic list netiquette in the plug-org list. or at > least try to be civil. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > riiighhhtt... and u knew it was off-topic.. but u just couldnt resist, > could u? > u just wanted to "give the last word" for the thread-topic... kinda like > a season-ender > speech.... > > hey, it was my first time to say something here about the "speeches", > but with u... > its a different thing... it's not just me who has noticed that u're only > a guard dog > for OT posts that u're NOT INTERESTED IN... be consistent!! > > follow ur own "suggestions" > > > > > Anuerin Diaz wrote: > > >On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:55:05 +0800, Ron Michael Khu > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>WOW! another political-speech contest! > >>=) > >> > >>i love these topics that would trigger people > >>to morph themselves into passionate politicians.. > >> > >>and even the guard-dog-please-use-the-other-mailing-list-for-ur-ot-posts > >>has joined in....(since he's only a guard dog for ot posts that he's not > >>interested > >>in) > >> > >>Amazing! > > > > > > > >thanks for your comment but your method of delivery does not help as > >it can be classified as trolling, it only serves to fan the flame to > >another direction. i dont know if you are pertaining to me or to tiger > >for trying to *police*[1] this list but that job should not have been > >required in the first place if this is to be a venue for *mature* > >individuals[2]. redirecting ot posts to their correct list should not > >be passed solely on the shoulders of a couple of *volunteers*. if you > >think you can do a better job, then contribute your time positively. > > > >this is really getting offtopic for this list. either continue it in > >plug-misc or discuss basic list netiquette in the plug-org list. or at > >least try to be civil. > > > >ciao! > > > >[1] i cant remember if i made an attempt. too much work in real life. > >[2] granted that a degree of consideration be given on a case-to-case > >basis. and who measures maturity anyway? > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List plug@lists.q-linux.com (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph . To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug . Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
