Your best bet for ER-X configuration is probably ubnt.com. The density of people familiar with stock firmware on ER-X, while non-zero, is much lower than there.
On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 3:02 PM Rich Shepard <[email protected]> wrote: > To configure a new Ubiquiti EdgeRouter-X (the semi-bricked one will be > restored after this one's up and running) I use a Dell Latitude 2100 > laptop. > The laptop's eth0 interface is configured 192.168.1.55, netmask > 255.255.255.0, broadcast 192.168.1.255. The router has the generic default > address of 192.168.1.1. > > The Dell's eth0 is UP and RUNNING but cannot ping the router; 'network is > unreachable.' There's no gateway for the two hosts, but the default on the > laptop is on a different subnet, that of the LAN (192.168.55.4). > > The kernel's routing table shows no route for eth0. When I run: > > route add -net 192.168.1.55 Nm 255.255.255.0 eth0 > > ('dev' is optional) the response is a presentation of how the route command > should be run. The syntax looks correct to me. On a few occasions in the > past a host on the LAN subnet has lost its default route which I easily > restored using 'route add default ...' (but eth0 is always shown) so I'm in > new territory here. > > While the location of specific files could be distribution-specific, the > commands are the same. > > For this 2-host network what do I read to get a route for eth0 so I can > ping > the router and communicate with it via its web interface? > > TIA, > > Rich > _______________________________________________ > PLUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug > _______________________________________________ PLUG mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
