On Mar 29, 2005, at 5:11 PM, Josh Coates wrote:
True, but I'm pretty safe.
i don't mean to be offensive, but here is free clue:
I think what he was trying to say was "no one can claim that he only hires LDS because most of his employees aren't".
Also, from what I understand of labor laws, I think you would have a hard time claiming some sort of discrimination if that is not part of the criteria in interviewing/applications etc. Also, company size is a factor (as shown in this URL (which may or may not be the official word) http://www.insurepro.net/html/equal_opportunityemployer.asp . Looks like as long as you are under 15 employees, the only thing you really _have_ to do is pay both genders the same wage.
However, I am not a lawyer, so I could be up in the night.
Grant
.===================================. | This has been a P.L.U.G. mailing. | | Don't Fear the Penguin. | | IRC: #utah at irc.freenode.net | `==================================='
