Yes 9 gigs is correct. It's possible that he didn't get the box version of the dvd. Does he have the live version? That fits on a single dvd. Or he striped out the 64 bit stuff.
Stephen On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 10:12 -0600, Walter Holladay wrote: > Forgive my ignorance, but just to make sure... You have a 9 gig iso? I > got the DVD iso from a friend at work, but it fits on a standard single > layer DVD, so it's nowhere near that size. > > Stephen Shaw wrote: > > >The difference is the hundreds of missing packages. A full install of > >9.3 is roughly 8 - 9 gigs. You just can't get everything on cds these > >days. From what I have noticed they usually don't put all of the mail > >stuff in the cds. If you want to do any server stuff it is usually > >better to use the dvd. I have the iso on my computer and then I usually > >do nfs installs. I'm willing to make that available. If you have a > >hard drive that is big enough what I normal do is after the install is > >put the iso on the computer, mount it and then make it the default > >install source. That way you never need to put the cds or dvd in again. > >It just eats up 9 gigs of hard drive. > > > >Stephen > > > > > >On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 23:45 -0600, Walter Holladay wrote: > > > > > >>I am using cds cause I don't have a dvd drive in the machine in > >>question. I could install one if needed. What difference does it make, > >>other than having to swap the cds in and out? > >> > >>Stephen Shaw wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>did you install from cd or the dvd? > >>>if you used the cds then stop you are wasting your time. > >>>if you are using the dvd (highly recommended) then you should be ok > >>> > >>>if you don't have the dvd, I'd be willing to help you install it from > >>>the iso that I have. I can't afford dual-layer dvds these days. > >>> > >>>Stephen > >>> > >>> > >>>On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 21:52 -0600, Walter Holladay wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>I'm trying to set up a Postfix server on Suse 9.3. However, for some > >>>>reason smtp is only visible on the local machine. When I run nmap from > >>>>the Suse 9.3 machine port 25 is listed. However, when I run nmap on > >>>>another machine, port 25 does NOT show up. > >>>> > >>>>Any ideas? > >>>>.===================================. > >>>>| This has been a P.L.U.G. mailing. | > >>>>| Don't Fear the Penguin. | > >>>>| IRC: #utah at irc.freenode.net | > >>>>`===================================' > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>.===================================. > >>>| This has been a P.L.U.G. mailing. | > >>>| Don't Fear the Penguin. | > >>>| IRC: #utah at irc.freenode.net | > >>>`===================================' > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>.===================================. > >>| This has been a P.L.U.G. mailing. | > >>| Don't Fear the Penguin. | > >>| IRC: #utah at irc.freenode.net | > >>`===================================' > >> > >> > > > >.===================================. > >| This has been a P.L.U.G. mailing. | > >| Don't Fear the Penguin. | > >| IRC: #utah at irc.freenode.net | > >`===================================' > > > > > .===================================. > | This has been a P.L.U.G. mailing. | > | Don't Fear the Penguin. | > | IRC: #utah at irc.freenode.net | > `===================================' .===================================. | This has been a P.L.U.G. mailing. | | Don't Fear the Penguin. | | IRC: #utah at irc.freenode.net | `==================================='
