Doh! Yeah, ok so I did miss the point. On 1/28/06, Byron Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 12:22:18PM -0700, Steve wrote: > > I'm curious as to whats wrong with netstat for this purpose? > > Or am I missing the point? > > I believe the original poster wanted to find how much bandwidth was > being used by a process. While netcat will show you which ports a > process is bound to, it will not show how much data is being sent over > those ports. > > -- > Byron Clark > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFD28XAErN13QQr6mgRAs/CAJ4/SVNjklIzofakv3bWEpcr9vHvIACeN4bs > HHNYHPyi+EG9Rc5N4FBTLHk= > =Jdy2 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > /* > PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net > Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug > Don't fear the penguin. > */ > >
/* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
