On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 12:35:57PM -0700, Steve wrote: > Doh! Yeah, ok so I did miss the point. > > On 1/28/06, Byron Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 12:22:18PM -0700, Steve wrote: > > > I'm curious as to whats wrong with netstat for this purpose? > > > Or am I missing the point? > > > > I believe the original poster wanted to find how much bandwidth was > > being used by a process. While netcat will show you which ports a > > process is bound to, it will not show how much data is being sent over > > those ports. > >
Not necessarily. Could you write a script to crunch Ethereal data and use netstat to divide the packets up by processes? -- Charles Curley /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign Looking for fine software \ / Respect for open standards and/or writing? X No HTML/RTF in email http://www.charlescurley.com / \ No M$ Word docs in email Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0 809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB
pgphXS99ShDwo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
/* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
