>A co-worker of mine still runs the 2.4 kernel on his MythTV (v. 0.16) >Slackware box, simply because the thing ``just works.'' He is more >likely to patch his kernel for SATA support than try to hoist his >kernel to the 2.6 branch; it would simply save him time and effort.
I still run 2.4 kernel on my desktop and most of the servers I manage for the exact same reason. My philosophy is if it ain't broke, don't fix it. I never upgrade unless it is a security issue or I *really* need a new feature.
-- Sasha Pachev AskSasha Linux Consulting http://www.asksasha.com Running Blog http://sasha.fastrunningblog.com /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
