On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 10:50 -0700, Andrew Jorgensen wrote: > you're going to have much better luck with an independent ratings > site than you will with the MPAA (aka the interested party).
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 10:50 -0700, Brian Hawkins wrote: > So just how are they going to enforce that? Are they going to > put together a group that searches the Internet looking for porn that is > on 80. I've got this crazy idea. Combine those two ideas. Create an independent organization that pays willing participants (I bet you could sign up college-aged males in droves) to look for uncategorized porn on the Internet. Pay them a buck for every website or something, probably require some sort of consensus or quorum. Then add it to a filter and publish. That's pretty much what Phish Tank[1] is doing for phishing. Heck, just like Phish Tank I bet you could find plenty of people to do it for free. Legislating technical solutions to a non-technical problem is not going to work in the long term. Social problems require social solutions. Corey 1. http://www.phishtank.com/ /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
