On Thursday 16 August 2007, Hill, Greg wrote: > I guess the idea is that once you're at the ceiling, you'll keep getting > the same salary for a long time and feel stagnant. I'd rather be > stagnant at a good salary than continually getting raises to be almost > where I should be. Plus, if you're underpaid, there's a better chance > that a competitor will whisk you away because they can afford to give > you a big raise. In that regard, I would think that it benefits both > the employee and employer to pay people what they're worth.
Not to mention that working where you know you're underpaid can be very demotivating--thus hurting productivity and moral, which can be contagious. Happy/satisfied employees work better. /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
