On 8/21/07, Wade Preston Shearer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And I will take my business elsewhere. That we can agree on. > > > > The point is that if they can control a particular type of protocol, > > what's to stop them from saying "well http is costing us too much so > > we'll start limiting it" > > Nothing. Don't they have the right to provide whatever service they > choose? > Actually, they don't. The customer does that for them, or at least it should be the reason they run their company, to help the customer succeed. If the customer succeeds, they make money. And that's really what they want even if they are providing this service isn't it? > > > would you get pissed then? > > Absolutely.
So what's the difference? bittorrent isn't inherently illegal. /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
