On 8/21/07, Wade Preston Shearer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That still doesn't make what they are doing illegal or unethical, > does it?
Having a monopoly on High Speed internet? Unethical? You decide. If you could only get TV through one cable provider (no OTA, no satellite) and that cable provider decided they weren't going to carry Fox 13, would you think it was illegal or unethical? You must have more choices for High Speed Internet. Or else you have a lower threshold for what "High Speed" means. I live on the west side of Woods Cross. I can't get DSL where I'm at and I've had Wireless in the past. Wireless was much slower than DSL. Thad /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
