On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 15:35 -0600, Bryan Sant wrote: > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Andrew McNabb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 03:20:28PM -0600, Bryan Sant wrote: > > > and because Adobe has provided a decent Linux version of Flash player, > > > > Ha! > > Sheesh. I'm detecting that I'm in the minority of persons having an > acceptable experience with Flash. I don't have anything to complain > about beyond flash ads being annoying. What is it about Flash on FF + > Linux that is any different than say Flash on IE6 + XP? > > I'm running Flash Player 9 32-bit on Ubunty 7.10. Works great 99.9% > of the time.
There is the key right there. 32-bit. Many of those who have annoyances with flash run 64bit. For me for example. Flash will dies either on some pages, i.e. the new dilbert.com, or after a certain amount of time, so if I leave my browser up for a while trying to maintain some information that I have up and then try to go to a flash site. suddenly flash is dead. and it doesn't just affect new pages. It affects anything that was flash that was previously open. Nathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
/* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
