Nathan Blackham wrote:
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 15:35 -0600, Bryan Sant wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Andrew McNabb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 03:20:28PM -0600, Bryan Sant wrote:
> and because Adobe has provided a decent Linux version of Flash player,
Ha!
Sheesh. I'm detecting that I'm in the minority of persons having an
acceptable experience with Flash. I don't have anything to complain
about beyond flash ads being annoying. What is it about Flash on FF +
Linux that is any different than say Flash on IE6 + XP?
I'm running Flash Player 9 32-bit on Ubunty 7.10. Works great 99.9%
of the time.
There is the key right there. 32-bit. Many of those who have
annoyances with flash run 64bit. For me for example. Flash will dies
either on some pages, i.e. the new dilbert.com, or after a certain
amount of time, so if I leave my browser up for a while trying to
maintain some information that I have up and then try to go to a flash
site. suddenly flash is dead. and it doesn't just affect new pages.
It affects anything that was flash that was previously open.
Nathan
I run it 32 bit at home and at work, and it still drives me nuts. I
have z-order problems that render lots of flash-heavy sites unusable.
Menus above flash tend to pop under the flash below them and I can't
select them. If that's the only navigation they provide, I'm dead. I
was just at Toyota.com last night and could barely use it. Grr.
Barry
/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
Don't fear the penguin.
*/
