On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 10:28 -0700, Aaron Toponce wrote: > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:23:40PM -0500, Daniel C. wrote: > > Because that would be lame. He wants a web site, not just a mishmash > > of "word" documents. > > Yet he described exactly what Google Docs provides, and "lame" isn't > exactly a good argument for not using the service.
How about this then: After using Google Docs just once, I broke out in a rash and had to take antibiotics for three weeks. Now I can't prove that Google was responsible. I'm just saying... /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
