On Apr 14, 2009, at 12:58 PM, Doran L. Barton wrote:
On Tuesday 14 April 2009 12:56:22 Kimball Larsen wrote:
Thanks for pointing them out, but their product line is too expensive
for this project. Their cheapest camera appears to run $800. Ouch.
/me points to TrendNet link again.
yes, I looked at the TrendNet cameras as well - they are only 648x480
cameras - I'm looking for something with a higher resolution.
At this point it would appear to be simplest to go and purchase a mid-
level consumer camera with time-lapse capability, get a large memory
card for it, mount it on the roof with a permanent power supply and
weather protection, and tell it to take a picture each hour.
-- Kimball
/*
PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net
Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug
Don't fear the penguin.
*/
