On 4/14/09, Kimball Larsen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thanks for pointing them out, but their product line is too expensive > > > for this project. Their cheapest camera appears to run $800. Ouch. > > > > > > > /me points to TrendNet link again. > > > > yes, I looked at the TrendNet cameras as well - they are only 648x480 > cameras - I'm looking for something with a higher resolution.
High Resolution != Low Cost Automated + High Resolution + Distance = Low Cost? Something isn't going to add up here. /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
