On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Christer Edwards < christer.edwa...@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > I think everyone on this list knows what net neutrality stands for > But I can just about guarantee they wouldn't all agree on one detailed definition. There are those who believe that nn means a couple of heavy torrent users can bring down a comcast neighborhood and comcast isn't allowed to do anything about it. Some people would actually limit browsers so strictly in their compliance that not only IE, but Firefox and Safari should be illegal. I think an open, neutral Internet is better than CompuServe, The Source, Prodigy, etc. I'm generally in favor of my definition of net neutrality. But what some people call net neutrality and want legislated seems counter-productive to me. /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
