On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Stuart Jansen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 10:18 -0600, Levi Pearson wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Michael Torrie <[email protected]> wrote: >> > That's an amazingly creative insult! And assuming quite a lot to boot. >> >> Just following your lead. You've been insulting all top-posters and >> assuming they're all lazy. > > Really? Citation needed.
Michael Torrie <[email protected]> wrote: > But that's not the worst of it. Almost without > exception when someone in the management hierarchy replies to my email > with top-posting it signifies that he or she did not read anything I > wrote and is just replying to what he or she thought I said. It's very > frustrating because it represents simple laziness on the other person's > part. If he's too lazy to read what I actually wrote, what else is he > lazy in? Maybe I was wrong to assume that this was indication that Michael associates top-posting with lazy email reading, and lazy email reading with general laziness. But that's what I was replying to. If Michael doesn't really believe that top-posters are lazy people, then that's great and I will revoke the applicability of my late-night rant to him. Assuming you don't believe that either, I'll also revoke it's applicability to you, and it will be left as a general rant not about any specific person on the list. --Levi /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
