On 04/27/2011 04:42 PM, Steven Morrey wrote: > The way i envision it any topic is fair game for discussion. People would > just be notified of a new topic via an atom feed and then subscribe to the > topic to participate in the debate. Im still trying to formulate a method > for establishing consensus but any letter of consensus would likely bare the > signatures of those who agree. Then again i think even that could be up for > debate. The whole point is to be effective without being annoying. >
You should look at the way EFF does it. Though I've heard those form letters are less effective. Jim Hansen told me that letters to the editor are very effective. Maybe we need to get in contact with a staffer and find out what they say works best. I know the house members often do return phone calls. Bishop,Matheson, Chaffetz, Hatch, and Lee are the people we are trying to influence. I think it's important to keep that in mind. As for issues on a state level just call your state rep. This group has shown that to be effective in the case of the law requiring people to password protect their router. Kyle /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
