On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Aaron Toponce <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 12:54:10PM -0600, Ryan Simpkins wrote: > > Over the last couple of years I've been maintaining a somewhat loose "No > > Recruiters" policy for things like the LinkedIN group and web site. The > number > > of recruiters requesting to join seems to be accelerating. Would anyone > like > > to put forth reasoned arguments for/against allowing recruiters to > participate > > in PLUG services? Their intention is obvious. They want to communicate > job > > opportunities and identify individual targets to cold call. They tend to > call > > you at work and home during and outside business hours. > > > > /Yes/No/Qualified Yes/Qualified No/ > > I have no problem with it, so long as they have their separate list. I > don't want to see them here, hoewever. > I also don't have a problem with them posting job openings. > > -- > . o . o . o . . o o . . . o . > . . o . o o o . o . o o . . o > o o o . o . . o o o o . o o o > > > /* > PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net > Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug > Don't fear the penguin. > */ > /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
