> Not necessarily. Most religions believe the soul is actually *more* > than what we perceive it to be here. Why couldn't a single soul > inhabit multiple instances of a body? If it is possible for a soul to inhabit more than one body then the value of "good" and "evil" is irrelevant to the corporeal versions of that soul. Otherwise the soul would have or create a means to share that information with each of it's corporeal forms. Since most of us agree that they weren't queen Cleopatra in a former life or alternate life (drag doesn't count) then it stands to reason that what we do is probably irrelevant to the soul only so long as it imparts that which the soul needs/desires.
I personally reject the lifestyle this notion advocates however i cannot flaw the logical potential. Personally i think my memories are relevant even if they are flawed and that the value of memory would be useful to a soul in all of its forms/avatars. That being said i want to believe that moral behavior is of value to my soul and therefore i i consider it useless for a soul to have more than one incarnation. /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
