On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 13:12, Jason Van Patten <[email protected]> wrote: > If it is possible for a soul to inhabit more than one body then the > value of "good" and "evil" is irrelevant to the corporeal versions of > that soul. Otherwise the soul would have or create a means to share that > information with each of it's corporeal forms. Since most of us agree
Why would the soul *have* to share that information while instantiated in corporeal form? > that they weren't queen Cleopatra in a former life or alternate life > (drag doesn't count) then it stands to reason that what we do is > probably irrelevant to the soul only so long as it imparts that which > the soul needs/desires. I disagree with your conclusion. I'm not espousing this idea as truth, just a what if. > I personally reject the lifestyle this notion advocates however i cannot This notion does not advocate anything, let alone a kind of a lifestyle. -- Alan Young /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
