I think your answer is good vs. evil. If the act is used for evil, then it is an act of terrorism. I think most people would agree with this.
------------------------ Keith Smith --- On Tue, 6/25/13, Daniel C. <[email protected]> wrote: From: Daniel C. <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Defining Terrorism To: "Provo Linux Users Group" <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, June 25, 2013, 12:13 PM On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Nathan England <[email protected]> wrote: > What I like best about this definition is because it makes it clear the U.S. > government is actively engaging in terrorism. Along with the democrats and > republicans, minorities, even the janitors at Walmart! It is a pretty useless definition. What counts as terror? If you tell a country's leaders that you're going to invade their country if they don't stop doing X, is that terrorism? What if X is genocide? What about a trade embargo - does that constitute terror? -Dan /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */ /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
