Ok dumb question, but is there a difference between aptitude and apt-get? They seem to work equally well. Why would you choose one over the other, except when performing a copy/pasta?
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:32 AM, Eric Wald <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jun 27, Nicholas Leippe wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Dave Smith <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Markedly absent from my list: emacs. > > > > > > > > That doesn't say much. I use emacs all the time--but you'll rarely see it > > in my history. I launch one instance (now in my xsession--so window > manager > > does it for me) and use it forever. > > I do the same thing, but with vim and ipython. But for my most commonly > unique commands, on my most frequently used box: > > 3334 git > 1438 ls > 879 less > 654 ack > 568 cd > 543 grep > 458 cat > 410 hg > 361 nosetests > 323 mv > 294 rm > 260 python > 250 echo > 221 sudo > 209 man > 185 aptitude > 165 for > 140 ssh > 127 mkdir > 103 diff > > Among those sudo commands: > > 61 aptitude > 24 apt-get > 19 service > 17 cat > 12 ls > 9 mv > 8 cp > 7 rm > 5 chgrp > 4 ln > > And yes, I use for loops on the command line. I'm more surprised by the > rm lines; I don't think of myself as that destructive. > > - Eric > > /* > PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net > Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug > Don't fear the penguin. > */ > /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
