On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Michael Torrie <[email protected]> wrote: > Thought some of you might be interested in this interview with Lennart > Poettering concerning systemd: > > http://www.linuxvoice.com/interview-lennart-poettering/
I disagree that this interview was good. In my opinion, it was just a puff piece. The interviewer didn't call him out on most of his non-answer answers. Before you call me ignorant, BS'er, or a hater, I am not a systemd lover or hater. Lennart has great technical chops, and has implemented many great ideas into systemd. It is way better than the old sysvinit systems. Though I have concerns with what it is becoming over time. The very first question asked about the biggest misconceptions. Lennart answered with two of them, monolithic and not like UNIX. He completely ignored talking about the first one, probably the most important one. Then he, seemingly willfully, misunderstood the not UNIX argument, and went off on a tangent. What is generally meant by this argument is that systemd goes against the general UNIX philosophy of small things that do one thing well working together. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_philosophy). The interviewer did not call him on it, nor did he ask about the complaint of being monolithic. The second question hit on another important topic of systemd doing way more than what was thought as intended. Went completely ignored. The second point in the question was about whether it was driven by Red Hat. This small point could have been answered with a single sentence or two, but turned into a bunch of shade-throwing at Canonical and Upstart, while talking about the history of Systemd. Again, the interviewer did not redirect Lennart to the first point. Third and forth questions were just fawning. Though it was a bit interesting to hear about internal Red Hat politics. Finally in the sixth question he was asked about his feature creep problem. Which was ignored for most of the answer. It wasn't until toward the end when he just said those are just optional, which is mostly true, but still somewhat troubling for me. TL;DR Not a good interview, mostly a puff piece that lets Lennart rehash stuff he has already said in blogs, Google+ posts, etc. A few interesting points, but not very good overall. /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
