On 08/27/2015 01:20 AM, Dan Egli wrote: > So what you're saying is if I have a CentOS server that provides, let's say > /nfsroot/apollo to clients as an NFS mount point (i.e. listed in > /etc/exports, with rw perms), and a CentOS client that boots with the > kernel args "root=/dev/nfs nfsroot=192.168.0.1:/nfsroot/apollo", that it's > going to automatically use NFSv4? Or would I need to modify things somehow?
I'm honestly not sure about the NFSv4 thing. The RHEL docs talk about setting up NFS the same way I've always done it, so maybe NFSv3 is still the default. > I'm all for setting this project up to be as current as manageable. The > odds of anyone needing to sudo things are fairly small (although they are > greater than zero), so I'm not overly concerned about that. Especially > as > _I_ would likely be the only one ever sudo'ing anything. Sounds like simple NFSv3 would be sufficient for your needs. And you're not alone there. NFSv3 still fits many people's needs particularly in the nfsroot situation. /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
