davep;149610 Wrote: 
> I imagine this is becasue LS has to build its own track index for use in
> executing searches.  It is either difficult or perhaps not possible to
> link this with the MM data.  I get exactly the same result on my
> system.  Hadn't noticed it before as I had never actually tried to do a
> MM mix off of a LS result.
> 
> davep

Something like that - it's because the normal database result browser
isn't being used for Lazy Search results and hence whatever code there
is in there for utilising MM on the search results isn't getting used.

I've had a request about that before and it's been difficult for me to
progress as I don't have MM (MusicIP these days, I believe). My
development server is Linux and I did get a trial key to test their new
beta Linux server, but I had little or no success getting that going.

I might take another look at it, though, if people find that very
useful (or they can tell me that MusicIP works well enough on Linux
these days...).

Stuart


-- 
hickinbottoms

-"Never put off until tomorrow what you can put off until the day after
- with 'Lazy Searching' (http://hickinbottom.demon.co.uk/lazysearch)!"-
------------------------------------------------------------------------
hickinbottoms's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=255
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29036

_______________________________________________
plugins mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/plugins

Reply via email to