philippe_44 wrote: 
> I think this time, the bridge does its job as expected: the track it
> receives from LMS is 48000 because you have told LMS that the Marantz
> only supports up to 48000. You have also set pcm mode to wav only.
> 
> So when you set sampling rate to exactly 96000, it will upsample to
> 96000 and send that in a wav format to the Marantz
> 
> When you set sampligin rate to ‘no higher’ than 96000, the every track
> below 96000 will remain untouched and because 48000 is received, it’s a
> match
> 
> I agree that we don’t need multiple resampling, hence the logic was to
> choose where you want it to happen: in LMS or in the bridge
> 
> I added these ‘full processing, options for 2 reasons
> 
> - features: true gapless, replay gain, fading
> - compatibility: by sending the same format always to the UPnP player,
> one can expect better compatibility 
> 
> Now you can decide to have, for example, C3PO do format and rate
> adaptation and it certainly has more flexibility, but unless you send
> pcm to the bridge, you won’t have the ‘features’ and if you do you’ll
> use maximum network bandwidth which a resource that I’m trying to
> preserve 
> 
> So, and again for the sake of tests, the ‘max sample rate’ that is wha
> the bridge reports to LMS should not be set to a value lower that the
> resampling rate. It’s not making it work incorrectly, but as you said,
> it multiplies resampling for no reasons. As soon as you play with
> resampling and full processing mode, you could let the max sample rate
> to 192000 or higher
I said I don't understand, and I don't.  My config is attached.  For the
Marantz I specify that it can do 96000, but this seems to be over-ruled
by the protocolinfo for raw, even though I'm using wav.

I would quite like to use 'flow' on my Marantz, but I can't work out any
combination of settings that will avoid 2 sets of resampling for my
range of tracks.

It doesn't really matter, but it's baffling.  I don't know how many
users will want to dive into this level of detail to keep the resampling
down to a minimum whilst get a stable result.  I understand that people
want fading etc (I don't), so it's good from that perspective.  I don't
really understand why anyone would want to use 'No Higher', and I don't
understand why, even without that, LMS is still ignoring the 96000
capability I specified.  

I just hope it's not going to cause too much confusion for users, and
work for you to explain it all.


+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Filename: UPnPconf.txt                                             |
|Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=25522|
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+


LMS 7.9.1 on VortexBox Midi box, Xubuntu 17.10, FLACs 16->24 bit,
44.1->192kbps.  Touch & EDO. 2nd Touch standard.
LMS plugin UPnP/DLNA Bridge to MF M1 CLiC (to A308CR amp & ESLs) &
Marantz CR603 UPnP renderers.  
Alternatively Minimserver & Upplay to same & to upmpdcli/mpd PC
renderers.  
Squeezelite to Meridian USB Explorer DAC to PC speakers/headphones.  
Wireless Xubuntu 17.10 laptop firefox/upplay or Android 'phone with
Squeeze-Commander/BubbleUPnP controls LMS/Minimserver.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PasTim's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=41642
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103728

_______________________________________________
plugins mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/plugins

Reply via email to